Reanimation package of reforms > News > Statements > We call on the President not to appoint judges who have not passed the qualification assessment

We call on the President not to appoint judges who have not passed the qualification assessment

Civil society organizations call on the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky not to appoint those candidates, who were submitted by the High Council of Justice and have a negative opinion of the Public Integrity Council and have not passed the qualification assessment in accordance with the law. 

On November 18, the High Council of Justice, along with judicial and advocacy organizations,  appealed  to President Volodymyr Zelensky to appoint judges ostensibly to resolve the personnel crisis in Ukrainian courts. At the same time,  91 out of 135 judges nominated to the President by the High Council of Justice have a negative opinion of the Public Integrity Council and have not passed the qualification assessment. 

Article 127 of the Constitution stipulates that only competent and virtuous citizens can be appointed to the position of a judge. In order to establish compliance with these criteria, a special procedure has been introduced – qualification assessment of judges with the participation of the Public Integrity Council. Only those judges who have confirmed their suitability for the position can be appointed for an indefinite term.

To appoint a person as a judge, in accordance with Art. 88 of the Law “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges”, 11 members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges, which has not been operating since 2019, must vote for it. The appointment of judges without such a procedure is illegal.  In fact, the High Council of Justice calls on the President of Ukraine to grossly violate Ukrainian law.

In addition, among the candidates submitted by the High Council of Justice are odious judges, such as Maidan Judge Viktor Kytsiuk, who  persecuted  protesters for traveling to Mezhyhirya. On June 26, 2018, HQCJ stopped evaluating Kytsiuk, ie he did not even complete the testing and did not pass the interview. Among the other candidates is Judge Eduard Bovkun, who was caught taking bribes in 2010. He was tried, but the case was dubiously closed, and he has not administered justice since. The public appealed to the High Council of Justice to stop breaking the law, but with no results.

In view of this, CSOs call on the President to leave the submission of the High Council of Justice on the appointment of persons for whom there is no decision on their suitability for the position without consideration. The Competition Commission will soon start working to reset the High Qualifications Commission of Judges, which should complete the evaluation procedure of judges with negative conclusions by the PIC.

The statement was signed by:

  1. Center for Policy and Legal Reforms
  2. Reanimation Package of Reforms Coalition
  3. DEJURE Foundation
  4. Anticorruption Action Centre
  5. All-Ukrainian Association “Automaidan”
  6. Center for Public Monitoring and Research
  7. Centre for Economic Strategy
  8. StateWatch
  9. Kharkiv Anti-Corruption Centre
  10. NGO Strong Communities
  11. CHESNO.Filter the Judiciary!
  12. Institute of Legislative Ideas
  13. Anti-Corruption Headquarters
  14. Media Initiative for Human Rights
  15. Bihus.Info
  16. CHESNO Movement
  17. Public Control Platform
  18. Anti-Corruption Research and Education Centre (ACREC)
  19. ZMINA Human Rights Centre
TOP